+33 (0)670 288 168

+44 (0)785 227 3507

SKYPE: Sandaion

Beach imageThis is an article that I posted on my former blog on Wordpress about 2 years ago, when I first started blogging.  I've revised and updated it, but it still seems to be relevant today.  Life's not always a beach!

 

 

You’ve probably heard of friends who emigrated to Australia or Spain or Greece and are now heading back to their country of birth, where they still have friends and family support networks . As housing markets collapse, property taxes rise and pensions dwindle away into nothingness, many retired British expats are choosing to return to the (still) welcoming bosom of the NHS. HR managers in multinational organisations have been aware of the problem for a while: that reality does not quite live up to expectations.  In the past, they could afford to be generous with relocation packages to make up for the discomfort of these massive family disruptions.  Nowadays, relocation packages are being squeezed and dual-career families are becoming a matter of necessity rather than choice.

So there we have it, that taboo word. The so-called ‘expat failure’ (although I am not sure most expats would like to call it that - ’realism’, ‘maturity’ or ‘homesickness’ might be equally valid terms).  It’s about expats returning home prematurely, or feeling unhappy in their host country.

In the case of people who fell in love with a villa in Italy, tried to renovate it and turn it into a B&B and then realised their dream life abroad was not quite such a dream, it can be a personal tragedy or it can be a quick rethink and no harm done.  From the point of view of multinational organisations who have a policy of sending employees abroad for 2-4 years, it is serious and it is failure.  There is the real cost of selection, training, relocation, repatriation, replacement … and then the hidden costs of not performing at expected levels while on an international assignment, or (even worse) damaging long-term relationships with the host country.

A lot of ink has been spilt on this topic, most notably on managing the cost of expat assignments (for example http://www.articles.totallyexpat.com/effective-strategies-for-expatriate-cost-management/), while some researchers contesting the notion of ‘expat failure’ (notably Anne-Wil Harzing as far back as 1995, see http://www.harzing.com/download/failurerates.pdf)

What I am more interested in is whether the much-publicised difference in failure rates between expats from different countries actually stand up to close scrutiny.  Over and over again I read that American expats regularly suffer failure rates of 10-20%, while European and Japanese  expats suffer less than 5%.  Tempting of course for all America-bashers to laugh loudly that US companies and their employees are less culturally sensitive and adaptable, or more imperialistic and inflexible.

But is that really the case?  Do these studies take into account the fact that for Europeans and Japanese managers global mobility is a key factor for progression to senior ranks, since their own markets are quite small?  Do they look at gender differences between the US and Japan and see that the Japanese accompanying spouse (almost always the wife) is far less likely to complain about the difficulties of living abroad?  Or that Japanese expats themselves will ‘toughen it out’ rather than admit defeat and return home early?  How much research has been carried out on expats from smaller European countries, who usually have far higher language proficiencies and a more international outlook?  I also suspect the success rates of expats moving from a developing culture to a developed one are much higher, but where is the research on that?

And how about a truly revolutionary idea for ensuring expat success?  Keep them there longer!   After about 5-7 years, most people will ‘go native’ and adapt quite successfully to their host country.  However, it is claimed that repatriation is then almost impossible or that they have lost their skills and social contacts.  Clearly, this is not ideal for everyone, but perhaps organisations can benefit from having a true ‘culture broker’ in some key hub spots, someone who is immersed in both cultures, can switch easily between terms of reference and act as a mentor and coach for all those working there on shorter assignments.

Have you experienced difficulties when living abroad?  Have you returned home earlier than you expected?  What would have helped most to make your stay abroad more enjoyable or successful?

Add comment


Security code
Refresh